You don't need to manually enable it for new users. Auditing is automatically enabled when you create a new mailbox.Here are some benefits of mailbox auditing on by default: Before mailbox auditing was turned on by default, you had to manually enable it for every user mailbox in your organization. This means that certain actions performed by mailbox owners, delegates, and admins are automatically logged, and the corresponding mailbox audit records will be available when you search for them in the mailbox audit log. Given the interest that Microsoft has in Groups adoption, perhaps we’ll see the sub-folders capabilities show up in the future.Starting in January 2019, Microsoft is turning on mailbox audit logging by default for all organizations. Work out which limitations are a showstopper for you, and which capabilities you need the most, and then make your decision based on that. If the public folders have a complex folder hierarchy that needs to be preserved, then you will basically lose that hierarchy due to the lack of sub-folders in Groups.Īs it stands right now, the decision to go with Groups or shared mailboxes is a case of “it depends”. The sub-folders capability is also a problem for anyone considering migrating public folders to Groups.
Although I prefer to recommend a proper ticketing/job management system instead, I understand that simpler scenarios don’t warrant setting up a whole separate system and that a shared mailbox with some sub-folders is quite sufficient. It’s quite common for teams that use a shared mailbox as an inbound communication channel to user sub-folder to sort or file away items that have been actioned. There is some demand for Group mailboxes to have sub-folders, as shown in the comments on this Uservoice suggestion. Shared mailboxes have more granular permissions available than Groups do.Shared mailboxes can have sub-folders in the mailbox, whereas Group mailboxes can’t.However, shared mailboxes have some capabilities that may make them more suitable to teams than Groups. Groups have connectors for integrating other applications.Groups have a guest access model for external collaboration that shared mailboxes do not.Groups include additional collaboration apps and resources such as a SharePoint team site, OneNote notebook, Planner, and Teams.Users (members) can subscribe to receive a copy in their own mailbox of the emails sent to the Group mailbox, which makes Groups work in a similar manner to distribution lists.Office 365 Groups have additional features that shared mailboxes do not. Emails sent to Groups and shared mailboxes are preserved for historical reference, unless deleted by a user.Users can send-as or send-on-behalf of a Group mailbox, just as they would a shared mailbox.A Group mailbox can be used as a single point of email contact for a team or group of users, just as a shared mailbox can be.Multiple users can access a Group mailbox, just as they would a shared mailbox.Groups in Office 365 have many of the features that Exchange Online shared mailboxes do. I was recently asked for my thoughts on using Office 365 Groups instead of shared mailboxes.